
REPORTERS AND "ARITHMOPHOBIA"
“If you can do that
calculation, I’ll give you a job here.” City of Waterloo treasurer
responding to questions about the repayment formula at the heart of
the RIM Park financing scandal.
By Kevin Crowley, The Record of Waterloo Region
Yes, I did the calculation. No, I didn’t take
the job.
I did, however, learn a valuable lesson about
numbers: Even accountants get them wrong. And that’s empowering,
especially for math-shy reporters.
It can also be rewarding. People who know their
numbers often use them to intimidate the rest of us. If you insist
that bureaucrats and business people explain their numbers, you
might just bag a major story.
But first things first.
The fear of numbers (it even has a name --
arithmophobia) seems to be a common problem for journalists. Like
deer in headlights, most of us freeze at the sight of percentages,
budgets and financial reports.
But like any phobia, the fear of numbers can be
tamed if not eliminated. In fact, a little fear is probably a good
thing, especially if it drives us to triple check every figure we
use in a story.
Just about all reporters encounter numbers at
one time or another, whether you’re an arts reporter covering the
symphony’s funding woes or a cop reporter trying to make sense of a
police budget.
My best advise is to confront the number beast
head on. That means figuring out what it is about numbers that
scares you, and then mastering it.
Baffled by percentages? Read up on how to
calculate them. Or, better yet, ask someone who knows his stuff to
explain exactly how to do it.
Unsure about the difference between
“operating profit” and “net income”? Look it up in a basic text or
on the Internet. Or, again, simply ask an expert, like a local
accountant or business professor.
Nothing beats confidence for overcoming fear.
But if you’re still trembling at the thought of a row of numbers, go
back to Journalism 101: There’s no such thing as a dumb question.
I’ve come a long way in my battle against
arithmophobia, but I still ask interviewees to explain their numbers
to me -- sloooowwwly.
When I first began looking into the RIM Park
financing deal, I couldn’t make sense of the complex repayment
calculation at the heart of the city’s financing contract. I
performed the calculation myself and came up with a total repayment
that was twice as big as the number being tossed around by the city
treasurer.
So I asked him to explain the calculation. He
couldn’t. In fact, he said he relied on the financing company to
explain it to him. “If you can do that calculation, I’ll give you a
job here,” he joked.
I was shocked. But, being less than confident
about my own math skills, my first thought was that I must be
missing something that was obvious to the accounting pros at the
finance company.
Because I lacked confidence, I shied away from
the repayment calculation in my first package of stories, choosing
instead to focus on other questionable aspects of the deal.
I later took one of those aspects -- the
interest rate -- to a couple of math experts: The Record’s own
chartered accountant and an accounting professor at the University
of Waterloo. Using spreadsheet software, they quickly found that the
city had indeed understated the real interest rate. Bingo -- I had a
major story.
A colleague of mine, who took over the story
while I was on vacation, then asked the UW professor and a finance
professor from the University of Western Ontario to try the
repayment calculation itself. Using their spreadsheet programs, they
confirmed -- independent of one another -- that my original
interpretation of the formula was correct. Ka-pow -- another big
story!
The lesson in all this?
Yes, numbers are intimidating, but they’re also
essential to good journalism, so you can’t afford to hide from them.
My advice is to tackle numbers head on, find
out what you don’t know, and always insist that bureaucrats and
business people explain their math.
Remember, it’s better to ask a dumb question
than to miss a big story.
(Kevin Crowley is a business reporter at The
Record in Kitchener-Waterloo. For his investigative work on this
story, he was named Western Ontario’s Journalist of the Year and won
a National Newspaper Award citation. He and the paper also won the
Governor-General’s Award for meritorious journalism.)
|