
Using effective quotes
-
The fact quote
-
The "referring to" or "said of" quote
-
The bracket crazy quote
-
Jargon quote
-
Fragmentary quote
-
Echo quote
-
Explanation quote
-
Predictable, pedestrian and cliche quote
-
Q tips
By Don Gibb
I had 15 minutes with Conservative leader
Robert Stanfield in the newspaper cafeteria and the same length of
time to write my story.
So I borrowed a tape recorder, thinking the
only sensible strategy was to pepper him with questions in the hope
of getting something worth writing.
I fired away. I didn’t have enough time to
write down one answer before I fired the next question … but then,
it was on tape and I could fill in the blanks as I was writing the
story later.
Back at my desk, I turned on the tape recorder
and listened as it repeated Stanfield’s words in an incomprehensible
slow motion. The battery had died and along with it, the words of
Robert Stanfield.
With only 15 minutes, I did all I could. Part
of the story read something like this:
Conservative leader Robert Stanfield said if he
becomes the next prime minister he will “look into” Canada’s health
care system. He said it is important to “fix things” before they get
worse. Stanfield said he saw it as his “duty” to tell
Canadians his plans for “their future.”
Although this story is as much about the
hazards of a tape recorder as about lousy quotes, you get the idea.
The fragmentations above need no quotation marks. In fact, the words
look silly with the added frills. They are only a disguise – a way
to try to fool readers and editors and to avoid having to admit that
I didn’t have a complete quote to use.
Quotes are an essential and effective writing
tool when they are used properly. They lend authenticity to a story,
they breathe life into it, they add credibility. And they allow
readers to hear another voice. A story that lacks quotes is usually
a pedestrian piece of passive writing.
But just as brilliant quotes bring a story to
life, quotes used poorly or in heaping quantities can smother it.
Quotes that do nothing more than introduce factual, routine
information – easily paraphrased – drag down a story.
Here are some of the pitfalls:
THE FACT QUOTE
“We looking for a 2002 or 2003 blue Toyota,”
the police inspector told reporters at the scene.
We have a reason for using such feeble quotes –
we haven’t got anything else. And we know that’s a poor excuse.
Having been a victim of the
find-a-quote-at-any-cost, I eventually turned finding good quotes
into a game. I told myself that every interviewee had to earn a
quote. It made me more alert to finding good ones and forced me to
work harder in an interview when I wasn’t getting good quotes.
THE “REFERRING TO” OR “SAID OF” QUOTE
Here’s a quote from a story about Colorado
Avalanche coach Bob Hartley taking the Stanley Cup to PPG automotive
glass plant in his home town of Hawkesbury, Ont.
“First thing I told him was you’re
crazy,” Gerry Lemieux, an operator at the plant for the last 28
years, said of the day Hartley left PPG to coach the Hawkesbury
Hawks of the Central Junior Hockey League in 1987.
“Said of” and “referring to” quotes often
need lengthy explanation. Often, the solution is to provide the
background first as a lead-in to the quote. In this case:
Hartley left PPG in 1987 to coach the Hawkesbury Hawks of the
Central Junior Hockey League. “First thing I told him was you’re
crazy,” said Gerry Lemieux, an operator at the plant for the last 28
years.
THE BRACKET CRAZY QUOTE
In this quote, Darcy Tucker, of the Toronto
Maple Leafs, is commenting on an incident where he was hurt in a
playoff game:
“If that’s (Detroit Red Wings centre) Steve
Yzerman getting hit like that, (the NHL would review the play),”
Tucker said, his left arm in a sling. “The other night (Yzerman)
goes under and hits (Chris) Pronger (of the St. Louis Blues) like
what happened with me and (Mike) Peca (in the first round of the
playoffs). I get abused for it. I’m called a dirty player. But
(Yzerman) does the exact same thing and he’s just trying to protest
himself.”
This is subjecting readers to unnecessary pain
and suffering. The need for so much bracketed material means you
must paraphrase. By doing so, you also highlight –and keep -- the
best part of the quote: “I’m called a dirty player. But (Yzerman)
does the exact same thing and he’s just trying to protect
himself.”
This bracket crazy quote, by the way, has all
the signs of a tape recorder quote. It tends to be bloated and comes
in a string of sentences.
JARGON QUOTE
Rather than explain a
complex issue to readers by paraphrasing what a speaker said, we
sometimes subject them to a speaker’s written words:
“Municipal legislation,
ethical codes and policies are vague with respect to both
the definition of conflict of interest and the
responsibilities of the elected members of municipal councils who
are in, or who encounter, conflicts of interest,”
said the councillor. “This vagueness creates
an increasingly untenable state of uncertainty and
vulnerability for the elected members of municipal councils as
well as undermining the legitimacy of those
elected to council in the eyes of members of the public.”
No doubt this comes directly from a motion
presented to city council, but it takes more than first-, second-
and third-reading to get the point here. Such technical jargon cries
out for paraphrasing:
Coun. Joan Jackson said
municipal councillors trying to deal with possible
conflicts of interest will get little help from vague
guidelines in municipal legislation, ethical codes and other
policies. Such vagueness creates
uncertainty and vulnerability for councillors, she
said, and undermines their legitimacy in the eyes of the
public.
FRAGMENTARY QUOTE
If the point wasn’t made with the Stanfield
partial quotes, here it is again:
The commissioner said
his new job will be a “challenge.”
The quote marks add nothing. Challenge
speaks for itself. However, if the words are unusual or show a
person’s personality, that’s when a fragmentary or partial quote can
work: The commission
described his new job as “walking barefoot on hot coals
every day.”
ECHO QUOTE
Hello … hello … where have I heard that
before? Echo quotes result when a reporter paraphrases a person’s
statement and repeats virtually the same material in a quote
directly following the paraphrase:
The chief
administrative officer said no layoffs will result from the loss of the
$7-million contract. “There won’t be any
layoffs as a result of the loss of this contract,” she said.
The simple solution is to make a decision on
one or the other – to paraphrase or to quote.
THE EXPLANATION QUOTE
It’s really lazy reporting to expect the
interviewee to do the heavy lifting by explaining – through a quote
– how things work. The writer needs to understand how something
works, but he doesn’t have to bore readers with the details:
“There are six- to
eight-week programs offered in aerobics, dance, clubs
and aquatics just to name a few. And the latest program
is called step. It is a bench that you step up on to
get your heart rate up. However, it is considered more
low impact than aerobics and because there is less
stress to the knees, the chance of injury is greatly
reduced,” he said.
This is all factual information that is best
paraphrased because the writer can say it more succinctly.
THE PREDICTABLE, PEDESTRIAN AND CLICHÉ
QUOTE
They can be used over and over again:
“It was awesome.”
“It was fun.”
“Thank God we have
closure.”
The only good feature of these quotes is
their length. In his book, The Craft of Interviewing, Tom Brady
describes quotes as “brief, brilliant bursts of life.”
I once read that writers should try to keep
quotes to one sentence. Two is OK, but three is usually one too
many. It’s not a bad “rule” to keep in the back of your mind,
especially for those who love to quote at length or regularly use a
tape recorder.
So what does work? Quotes that give readers
a glimpse into personality – that show emotion. Quotes that express
a point of view. Quotes that don’t appear to have been rehearsed or
taken from a press release.
Here are a few examples:
“I was so afraid of
closing my eyes,” she recalled recently. “And it was
so odd. There was no pain, no pain at all.” (A woman talking about
the day a gunman tried to kill her.)
Apartments are so
scarce that even veteran real estate agent Joan
Wilson, who has to move in two months, can’t find a
place. “I think I should
fire myself.”
One final note about quotes – and that is
dialogue. Dialogue is often overlooked by writers, but it does a
wonderful job of taking readers into the scene. It could be an
exchange between a lawyer and witness in court, between politicians
in parliament or a reconstruction of a conversation that is vital to
telling a story.
I like this dialogue from a Toronto Star
story looking into the treatment of the elderly in Ontario’s nursing homes. A woman rushes to
the nursing station, concerned about the smell coming from her
mother:
“There’s a terrible
smell from my mom,” Martina said, slightly
embarrassed. “I think she may have soiled herself.” “Don’t worry about
it,” the nurse replied, “we’ll look into it.” Every day for more
than two weeks, Martina asked the nurses for the
source of that smell and each time she was told not to
worry, they’d look into it.
And this from a Globe story about the work
of an ambulance crew:
Mr. Grayson takes
over the case and patches the woman on to a
portable heart monitor. “Is it a heart
attack?” a nervous mother-in-law asks in halting English. “No. No,” Mr.
Grayson says, “I wish my heart was this good.” “Thanks God,” the
woman says, here hands folded upward in prayer.
So after all of this, what’s the real
message?
Just as you double-check your story for
accuracy, challenge your quotes to make sure they pass the test of
being real, engaging and meaningful. Do not allow yourself to use a
quote that doesn’t sound like something someone would say in a
conversation.
If you read the quote aloud, you’ll get a
better sense of how it sounds. Ask yourself: Does this sound as if
the person is standing in front of me (or the reader) saying these
words? Remember: a person’s gotta earn that quote.
(Don Gibb teaches reporting at Ryerson’s
School of Journalism in Toronto.)
Q-TIPS
1)
Keep them short.
2)
Paraphrase the routine.
3)
Use to capture emotion – joy, frustration, excitement, anger.
4)
Use to provide opinion, offer perspective.
5)
Use to highlight important information or testimony from
documents, courts, parliament.
6)
Use to advance the story through narrative.
7)
Use to highlight material where the precise words are
important.
8)
Use to support statements made in a story.
9)
Use to add colour.
10)
Use to bring another voice into your story.
|